When I used work in radio, I used to get in trouble with the majority of listeners (but not all) when when we used talk about emigration
Think
an alternative view
Wednesday, September 4, 2024
Why Emigration in Ireland is not necessarily a bad thing
Thursday, November 16, 2023
Driving
Greetings !
I am somewhat embarrassed to note that is 7 years since I was last writing on this platform - for that I can only apologise
Here in Dublin there has been much focus on the amount of people who are dying on our roads this year. We had been doing better in the past few years, but this year the figure, with one and a half months to go, is very poor indeed with 166 people not about this year who were here last year
It is not for me to say why, other than my own experiences, but suffice to say that people are simply not best equipped to drive on our roads. From the outset, the driving test is wholly and completely inadequate. People (mostly teenagers and young people) are not tested at night, not tested (or indeed taught) on motorways and, perhaps as important, not taught about the etiquette on the road. The ability to make a car go forwards, or backwards, or around a corner, does not demonstrate an ability to drive.
When I was 17 I passed my test the first time, most probably with a bit of luck. My brother, in his test, broke and amber traffic light and on another occasion, stalled the car - he passed too !!! Like all 17 yr olds I thought I was invincible and drove at high speeds all over the place. However, there was no real drug culture - there sure was, and still is, a big problem with drink - and I drove a diesel VW Golf, so I wasn't able to go THAT fast
I am not in my 50's (my missus describes me as some sort of grumpy old something or other) but what I witness out on the roads these days is simply carnage. Both males and females unable to know the capabilities of their cars (in fact some of them are challenged to see over the dashboard !!!), drive at breakneck speeds, on roads that are simply not up to it. They, like me at that age, think that they were simply indestructable - they are not !
We have a thing in Ireland, called TY - Transition Year - where, apart from an academic year of lessons and homework, kids are given a little more freedom to learn other things about life. In my grumpy opinion, it is, in essence, a year off !!!
One thing that could be done in TY (usually ages 15-16) would be perhaps to teach kids how to drive - and how to drive properly. Teach them how to behave in their cars, including letting others out from side roads, thanking others for letting them out, doing the same, even though it is your right of way etc etc
Another important lesson is how to behave on the Motoroways. I am amazed that in 2023, people are not taught how to drive on motorways - they are actually forbidden to drive on motorways !! How on earth are they supposed to drive thereon, when they have passed their test and are legally allowed to do so. Fairs fair - you can't be expected know how to drive on the fastest roads we have, if you have never been taught !! I have witnessed a person driving on to the M50 (Dublin's orbital motorway) and actually STOPPING at the end of the on ramp, where it joins the motorway - they did that because they DID NOT KNOW what to do !!! You can just imagine the amount of drivers venting their fury !!!
Also, whilst I'm banging on about motorways, the outside lane is often referred to as the 'fast lane' This is incorrect. It is the 'overtaking lane' and you should not be in it, unless you are overtaking - and, for what its worth, you are NOT the police. If you are driving in the overtaking lane, which I have already pointed out that you should not be, unless you are passing someone out, and are driving at the speed limit, it is not for you to stay belligerently out there to keep all and sundry from breaking the speed limit. You do not know who is behind you, or why they want to drive faster than you - they may well be road hogs, but it is not your responsibility to keep them back - they may be in a hurry to catch a plane/train, or to see an elderly relative that has fallen down the stairs and is being rushed to hospital. It is very dangerous behaviour that may well result in a bad accident, which whilst not caused by you directly, you had a part to play in.
In my humble opinion, the roads are tough enough to navigate without having to put up with d*ckheads. So, why don't we ALL try something new - let every driver (yes, that includes you) let one car out in front of them, whether it is a side road, a car park or something different - and if someone lets you out, make sure you let them know you appreciate their doing so - be it a beep of the horn, a wave or a flash of your hazard lights - isn't it nice to say 'thank you' and to be 'thanked'
If someone pulls over on a major road, to let you pass by, then flash your hazard lights to them when you are passed. It just makes the effort worthwhile.
One thing that makes my blood boil is that when you do something like the above for someone and they do not acknowledge you. Taxi drivers and Bus drivers, you know who I am talking about - not every taxi driver or bus driver is ignorant, but a large percentage of them are
Finally, we all should try and be a little more accommodating on the roads - this also means using your rear view mirror. If you can pull up closer to the car in front of you in traffic, in order to accommodatre another driver, then please do so
The way to judge ANY of these situations is to put yourself in the place of some looking for a favour
Happy and Safe Driving
DC
ps - please turn off your rear fog lights - that is if you know where the button is, and if you are aware that they are on in the first place - yes, that is what that funny light on the dashboard means !!!!
Wednesday, October 5, 2016
The Media - Friend or Foe ?
Tis been a while !
Recent events in the UK have once again prompted me to take up my pen - or keyboard in this case ! I will start out by saying that I have no particular love for the man in question, whom I shall name in a few moments, but it is the wider situation which intrigues me, and perhaps you might let me know what you think ?
The English soccer manager, or rather he who held that onerous position until last week, was a chap by the name of Sam Allardyce. As I said I have no particular like, or indeed dislike, for this man, but I very much have a problem with the way in which he was dismissed from his job. That is not to say that he didn't deserve it, I just have a problem with the way in which he 'met his fate'
Basically he was 'entrapped'. He was set up by the editor of the Telegraph newspaper, who got a few lads to pose as someone they were not, and get him to say things he should not have said. Again, this is not about who he was, nor what he said. It is about the editor of a Broadsheet, not a tabloid, setting out to 'frame' this guy. Apparently there is a lot of corruption in football (wow - now that is news !!!) and they were leading the posse in ridding England of these people.
As a one time member of the Media, and one who still works very closely with it, I have some strong views on how strong the media can become, if unchecked. What's that I hear you say ? 'You can't check the media! - they are our only way of finding out about the truth - they expose all the wrongdoings of our corrupt society'
Ah yes, I reply ! Perhaps - but who polices the police ? Most are aware that the media can be used in some pretty terrible ways, to advance all sorts of agendas - just look at the likes of the Murdoch Machine and Fox News.
The media in the UK has become pretty powerful and now might take some amount of grit and energy to bring it to heel. Just look at recent scandals where so called journalists 'hacked' into the phones of people, some even deceased, to find a 'juicy' story. To this writer that is even more heinous than going through people bins to pry even closer. Is this the type of journalism we need ? It is perhaps, what we deserve, but is it what is needed ? Which came first, the Chicken or the Egg ?
The death of Princess Diana was another 'black day' for the media. There was outrage at the fact that her car crashed at high speed, trying to avoid the 'paparazzi' who were trying to get photos of her, with Dodi al Fayed. Is it possible, do you think, that the ones who voiced most outrage at this invasion of her privacy, would have bought the same magazine that carried those self same photos ? Mmmmm
Remember Matthew Kelly ? Again a person who this writer had no particular opinion on, one way or another, but one of the red tops ran a story on him years ago, revealing he was a paedophile. This was completely untrue. However, the fire was lit, the smoke started billowing and because some little bastard of an editor, or so called journalist, ran the story, the fickle people believed the story and Mr. Kelly's life was forever changed. He lost his life. His family. His name. Everything ! Now, I hear you say that he could have sued. He did ! and he won ! Something like £300,000 - but what did that do for him ? Nothing was the answer - though I do agree it is better to have it, than not. You see, the damage that was done by that headline and article, could not be undone ! Ever ! People believe that bad stories, not the good - and don't wanna know about the truth. Lazy, vindictive, irresponsible lies - and here is the rub, which you may or may not know about - Newspapers, and indeed other forms of media, can insure themselves against being sued for libel - so, in this case, all the newspaper had to do was pay a bigger premium on their insurance the following year !!
So, what type of newspaper do you want to read, or perhaps, what type of society do you want to live in ? There are, of course, many hundreds and thousands of great journo's and editors who do fantastic work, but we do, today, live in a society, that tolerates this behaviour - and this is where I have a problem on an unfettered press. Exactly how we 'fetter' them I do not know - perhaps we could take away such insurance and maybe strictly discipline those who do not do their job properly.
I suspect, that like most industries, the answer can only come from within the media itself
Thursday, January 5, 2012
Justice ? What Justice ?
I cannot confirm which of our 'genius' Justice Ministers brought this in, but when asked, a recent Minister said that is was a 'good' human rights thing to have !! These people have gotta be joking and have obviously NEVER been the victims of a crime(s).
It is in light of policies like this that the phrase 'bleeding heart liberals' becomes bandied around, and it is easy to see why. Our Judges often react quite virulently when criticised about their sentencing and they resist all attempts to make a more transparent system, with mandatory sentencing for certain crimes. It is all too easy to point out the ones that make the headlines, but the system does need a radical overhaul.
There was one female judge, no longer sitting in court, who used be quite lenient on those who appeared before her, charged with 'bag snatching', gentling reprimanding them and scolding them, like some sort of embarrassed mother of an unruly urchin - can you guess what happened next ? Yep ! You got it - her bag was 'snatched' - quite violently as it happened, and from then on, every person in front of her, got the full 'treatment'. Do Judges need to see what live is like 'on the streets' and not 'in their club' or in their 'leafy suburbs' ?
Another person who pleaded guilty to the rape of a foreign national in the South East, got a five year sentence, with two years suspended and the judge noted in his remarks that the guilty party was a man of some standing and character !!! You wouldn't believe it if you read it in a book ! You'd think it was too far fetched. Imagine if you will, if that girl (who was believed to be a prostitute) was Irish, and was related to the Judge ? Would there be a different outcome ?
The 'do-gooders' of this world, have turned society into a laughing stock from the criminal classes. They are simply laughing at the protection afforded TO them BY us, their victims. Don't get me wrong - I know they're not Revolutionary Bombers or trying to incite hatred from one society to another - what they are, is ordinary indecent bloody criminals who sometimes need a bloody good kick in the jaxxy - if you know what I mean ?
Oh... but they from disadvantaged families in disadvantaged areas .... poor little lads and lasses ..... we should help them ..... show them we care .... blah blah blah. Former Mountjoy Prison Governor John Lonergan, used identify three areas of Dublin's Inner City as being the areas where 90% of his 'clients' are from - but what bout the hundreds and thousands of people who come from and came from these areas, that never turned to crime ?
The Human Rights activists tell us that these people were bored and that is why they turned to crime - they had nothing to do !!! boo hoo - I had nothing to do when I was a 12, 13, 14 year old, but I didn't turn to crime, nor did my friends or family - is that now considered to be LUCKY - no way - that, in my view, is NORMAL.
I don't want prison to return to some Dickensian Institution, but surely, when you are sent to prison, it is supposed to one place that you never want to go back to ? The amount of recidivism in Irish prisons is MASSIVE - you'll never see an Irish prison on those channels that show the worst penitentaries in the world !
Here's a novel idea for those who, in my mind, are overly concerned about the 'rights' of our prisoners - IF YOU INFRINGE UPON THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS BY YOUR ACTIONS, OR AS A RESULT OF YOUR ACTIONS, THEN YOU CAN NO LONGER AVAIL OF YOUR OWN RIGHTS - INFRINGE THE RIGHTS OF OTHERS AND KICK YOUR OWN INTO TOUCH !
Does it not seem absurd to you, that a person can break into your house, be caught by you, or indeed injure themselves somehow, and they can successfully sue YOU ?! The law says that perhaps they might have strayed into your house BY MISTAKE - has this EVER happened ? has it ever happened often enough to be enshrined in our law ? What a load of old bullocks !
However, I will admit, that if we put the same amount of monies into the early schooling years that most other OECD Countries do, we might start to produce young children, who MIGHT not get involved in crime, but MIGHT go further in education and stay 'in the system' longer. There's no point in having free third level education to try and encourage people from certain income levels to go on to third level, when a huge amount of them haven't even finished secondary level
Think about it ..................